COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 9
MINUTES OF BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ MEETING
February 14, 2008
STUDY SESSION
Executive Session
Executive Session was held from 8:05 am to 9:20 am for the purposes of
discussion of the performance of a public employee. The Executive Session continued at 9:20 am
for the purpose of discussion of the performance of public employees with
regard to Tenure and also for the purpose of discussion of real estate. Executive Session adjourned at 10:02 a.m.
Study Session adjourned at 10:02 a.m.
MEETING
Call to Order
Karen Vander
Roll Call
Members Present: Karen Vander
Rita
Creighton
Elizabeth
Chen
Ed
Davila
Mike
Regeimbal
Attorney General
Representative: Derek Edwards
Approval of Minutes
The minutes of the
Regular Meeting of the Board of Trustees on January 17, 2008 were approved.
Correspondence
Jack Bermingham announced
that
Dr. Bermingham spoke
of the press conference held in White Center on February 13th in
which the
Standing Reports
Associated Students of
Student Body
President, Steven Simpkins reported.
Lydia Bracco
reported.
Ruth Windhover
reported.
Ruth began her
report by saying she had served as a faculty member at Highline for 21 years,
so it had now been18 years ago that she had received Tenure. She said that in that time, she and many
others who have been here for a long period of time, have seen a major change
at Highline. She said Highline has gone
from an average community college to an outstanding community college both
within the state, and nationally. She
went on to say that Highline has an exceptional faculty due to a very
aggressive recruitment of diverse faculty.
She said Highline also has an exceptional administration. Five years ago the accreditation committee
gave Highline an outstanding evaluation which noted Highline’s spirit. Ruth said she feels this spirit is a result
of a high level of collegiality and cooperation between the faculty and the administration. From her contact with faculty throughout the
state and nationally, she said the level of communication between faculty and
administration both through formal negotiation and more importantly through informal discussion is unusual if not
unique. She said faculty feel they have
a voice in decision making and their contributions and values are
understood. So when administrators have
different views from faculty, and their decisions reflect those different
views, the faculty nevertheless supports them, because their voices have been
heard.
Ruth expressed the
faculty’s disappointment in the Board’s decision regarding the Presidential
Search Process. They were disappointed
that constituent groups’ representatives will not have the opportunity to sit
on the interview committee or to discuss finalists with the Board after the
finalists’ visits. She said this is a
significant departure from the Board’s previous presidential search
process. At that time, the constituent
group representatives participated in the interviews, site visits, and
discussions with the Board before the Board made their decisions. She said it was also a departure from the
process that the State Board itself used when hiring its executive
director. In that process, finalists
were interviewed by a committee that included not only Board members, but a
college president, college trustees and a faculty member. Ruth said she happened to be that faculty
member. She disagreed with the decision
that was made but supported it because she had had her voice heard, and had an
opportunity for face to face discussion with Board members concerning the
candidates and the process. Ruth
explained that as she had expressed in her email communication to the Board, a
great deal of additional information will be developed through references and
background checks, interviews, and constituent meetings. She said differences between finalists will
become much clearer, and the constituent groups will have a unique perspective on
this information and their representatives need to be able to articulate their
constituency’s assessments of each candidate to the Board. She hopes that the
Board will see their desire for representatives to have face to face
conversations with the Board prior to making their final decision as a valuable
asset and also as a means of continuing the relationship that has made Highline
so strong and so effective as a community college.
Faculty Senate
Ruth Frickle
reported.
Action Item on Recommendations
for the Tenure Track Process:
Trustee Mike
Regeimbal introduced the following motion:
Having given due
consideration to the recommendations of the Tenure Review Committee and the
College President, Mike Regeimbal moved
to recommend the following candidates for Tenure after 3 years of Probation:
Oussama (Sam) Alkhalili – Business Information Technology
Sherri Chun – Business Information
Technology
Ché
Dawson – Paralegal
Marie Esch-Radtke – Nursing
Tommy Kim – Writing
Jessica Neilson – Paralegal
Jeff Owens – Chemistry
James Peyton – Economics
Ben Thomas – Music
Teresa Trillo – Nursing
The motion continued
to recommend the following candidates from second year to third year Tenure
track probation:
Kat
Chappell – Medical Assisting
Patricia McDonald - Education
Matt Schwisow - Writing
Lonnie Somer - Anthropology
The motion again
continued to recommend the following candidates from first year to second year
Tenure track probation:
Shawna Allen – Math
Teri Balkenende – History
Rich Bankhead – Engineering
Dan Drischel – Human Services
Monica LeMoine – Writing
Kris Mason – ABE/ESL
Anthony Newton – Accounting
Bevin Taylor – ABE/ESL
Rita Creighton
seconded the motion.
The Motion passed
unanimously.
Update on Presidential Search Process
Karen Vander
Rita Creighton submitted
the following report:
The Committee met on
Monday, February 11, 2008 with Dr. Don Cameron of the search firm. Dr. Don Hunter was unable to attend due to a
family emergency. The search process
continues to be on schedule and as agreed to in the process plan.
The committee met to
discuss the search process and review the roles of PSAC members, the
consultant, staff facilitator and the Board of Trustees.
All PSAC members
signed confidentiality agreements and reviewed the work plan for initial
reduction of applications.
Twenty-six
applications have been received and screened for completeness and verification
that all applicants met the stated requirements. All applicants have doctoral degrees.
Rita explained the
field was varied.
PSAC members have
begun review of the applications and will meet on February 21 to reduce the
applicant pool to twelve for the next sate of the process.
Candidate videos
will be developed for PSAC review between March 7th and 17th.
Details for
candidate interviews and site visits still need to be developed.
Rita added that she
hoped that this would address some of the concerns expressed by Ruth Windhover.
Report on Human Services
Employment Professional Certificate Program and partnership with
Highline Community College and collaborations with W.i.S.e.,
O’Neill and Associates and local County Development Disability
Divisions
Alice Madsen began
the report with an apology for the technical difficulties with the PowerPoint
presentation, but explained that this time allowed her the opportunity to
acknowledge several key people whose efforts have made this program a possibility. They included Joyce Duran, Project Manager,
employed by King County (who was unable to attend during this time as she was
traveling in Thailand), Dan Drischel and Judy Perry, both of Highline, and also
Teri Johnson (the first instructor with the Employment Professional Certificate
Program), who works with O’Neill and Associates.
She explained that
one very interesting statistic was that the unemployment rate for persons with
disabilities nationwide is about 70%, and for the State of
Teri Johnson
continued this report with a PowerPoint presentation highlighting these areas:
Judy Perry added
that to her knowledge, there was no other State who was currently involved in
this level of training, as many four-year programs do not have the
concentration of resources available for this type of program. She also added that students in these
programs all work for non-profit agencies.
AREA REPORTS
General Administration
Larry Yok reported.
Student Services
Toni Castro
reported.
Instruction
Marie Zimmerman
reported.
Institutional Advancement
Lisa Skari reported.
Karen Vander
President’s Remarks
Dr. Bermingham was
pleased to report that the American Council for Education had picked up the
article from the
Dr. Bermingham
wished to express his congratulations to the faculty who received Tenure
through the Action of the Board of Trustees at this meeting. These individuals contribute to what makes
Highline an engaging campus and why it continues to have an impact on the
broader campus of the educational climate here.
He added his thanks to Dan Drischel who was already playing a leadership
role on our campus but was also an influence across the State in the Human
Services Program. He extended his
congratulations to Judy Perry and her program’s success.
Lastly, Dr.
Bermingham wished to thank the Trustees for their role in the advocacy of the
College. He wished to specifically thank
Karen and Elizabeth for their efforts in January in meetings with Legislators
and other groups.
A special thanks was
extended to Larry Yok by Dr. Bermingham for his extended efforts on the arduous
task of putting together the documentation to forward to the State for an
approval to move forward on the Federal Way Lease. He expressed that Larry’s willingness to go
above and beyond his current duties with this effort was no small task, and
very much appreciated.
Unscheduled business
None.
New Business
None.
Adjournment
The meeting was
adjourned at 11:26 a.m.
Next Regularly Scheduled Meeting of the Board
of Trustees
The next regularly
scheduled meeting of the Board of Trustees will be on March 13, 2008.
Karen Vander